Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Crossover effect of knee and ankle joint training on knee mechanics after ACL reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial.
Ashour, Ahmed Atteya; Elhafez, Salam Mohamed; ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy; Hanafy, Abeer Farag.
Affiliation
  • Ashour AA; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, October 6 University, Egypt. Electronic address: ahmed.ashour125@gmail.com.
  • Elhafez SM; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt. Electronic address: egyptsalam@yahoo.co.uk.
  • ElMeligie MM; Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, Egypt. Electronic address: mohamed.elmeligie@acu.edu.eg.
  • Hanafy AF; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.
Gait Posture ; 113: 512-518, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173441
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation is a common intervention after ACL reconstruction. Since different types of exercise can influence muscle and kinematic parameters in diverse ways, the training order between the knee and ankle joints may also change gait parameters.

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to investigate whether the training sequence of the knee and ankle joints (knee followed by ankle training or vice-versa) in an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) rehabilitation program has any effects on knee extension and flexion torques.

METHODS:

Forty-two men (aged 20-30 years) with ACLR participated in this study. They were randomly allocated to receive one of two

interventions:

(A) knee joint training followed by ankle training or (B) ankle joint training followed by knee training. After five weeks (four weeks of intervention and one-week washout), participants crossed from one group to another for an additional four weeks. Knee extension and flexion torques were assessed during the stance phase of the gait cycle before and after the intervention program.

RESULTS:

Two-way Mixed-design MANOVA showed that knee extension torque improved significantly in both groups after training (p = 0.001, Cohen's D = 0.65), while the knee flexion torque increased significantly only in group B (p= 0.001, Cohen's D = 0.97). When comparing both groups, patients of group B presented significant improvements in the post-training mean values of all tested variables compared with group A.

CONCLUSION:

Starting a post-ACLR rehabilitation program with ankle training followed by knee training is better to improve knee flexion and extension torques during the stance phase of the gait cycle than starting the program by training the knee first, followed by the ankle. Future studies using a mixed-gender sample and different types of ACLR operations are necessary to examine whether similar improvements will happen as well as to test their effects on many sports activities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / Knee Joint / Ankle Joint Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / Knee Joint / Ankle Joint Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom