A Systematic Review of the Use of Routine Versus Selective Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth.

ABSTRACT

Episiotomy is a common obstetric surgical procedure involving an incision to enlarge the vaginal opening, facilitating the delivery of the fetus during the second stage of labor. Hence, the current review was conducted to assess the impact of using selective versus routine episiotomy during vaginal birth on birth outcomes. This systematic review used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews and research syntheses. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and SCOPUS were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from relevant studies. Four studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The findings suggest selective episiotomy is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes than routine episiotomy in certain contexts. However, results varied, indicating the importance of tailoring episiotomy practices to specific patient populations and healthcare settings. To conclude, the review supports the use of selective episiotomy over routine episiotomy during vaginal birth, as it is associated with fewer adverse maternal outcomes.