Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incremental Efficacy for Repeat Ablation Procedures for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: 5-Year Follow-Up.
Sanchez-Somonte, Paula; Kittichamroen, Natchayathipk; Gao-Kang, Jenny; Azizi, Zahra; Alipour, Pouria; Kahykin, Yaariv; Pantano, Alfredo; Verma, Atul.
Affiliation
  • Sanchez-Somonte P; Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Kittichamroen N; Departamento de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gao-Kang J; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
  • Azizi Z; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
  • Alipour P; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Kahykin Y; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Pantano A; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
  • Verma A; Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
JACC Adv ; 3(9): 101200, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247677
ABSTRACT

Background:

Catheter ablation atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective, but 20% to 40% of patients will require a repeat ablation. The role of more than 1 repeat ablation is not well known.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and incremental benefits of multiple repeat catheter ablations to treat AF in patients.

Methods:

We retrospectively included patients who underwent their first, second, third, and fourth AF ablation between 2004 and 2019. They were monitored with a 24-to-48-hour Holter every 3 months postablation the first year and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Recurrence was defined as documented atrial arrhythmia >30 seconds. Outcomes are analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log rank test.

Results:

We included a total of 2,194 patients (64% with paroxysmal and 36% with nonparoxysmal AF). Mean age was 71 ± 10 years; 67% were male. After 1 ablation, freedom from AF was 52%. Among those 1,052 patients who had recurrences, 576 (55%) underwent a second ablation, 103 (10%) underwent a third procedure, and 20 (2%) underwent a fourth. Success rates for the second, third, and fourth ablation were 57%, 60%, and 40%, respectively, at 5-year follow-up. After the second ablation, freedom from AF in our entire cohort increased from 52% to 66%, with marginal changes after the third (67%) and fourth (67%) procedures.

Conclusions:

Although repeated ablations demonstrated significant benefits at the individual level, the success rate may drop off after a third. The overall success of the initial cohort was not significantly influenced by the success rates of multiple follow-up ablations.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JACC Adv Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JACC Adv Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United States