Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heterogenous relapse and efficacy endpoint definitions for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder studies: A systematic review.
Rocha, Rebeka Bustamante; Bomtempo, Fernanda Ferreira; Tadinac, Ana Claudia Benevides; Allioni, Gabriela Abrahao; Silva, Guilherme Diogo; Telles, João Paulo Mota.
Affiliation
  • Rocha RB; School of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, R. Afonso Pena, 1053, Manaus, AM, 69020-160, Brazil. Electronic address: rebeka.rocha@ufam.edu.br.
  • Bomtempo FF; School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias, 275, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-110, Brazil.
  • Tadinac ACB; University of South Carolina/Prisma Health, 8 Richland Medical Park Dr #420, Columbia, SC 29203, United States.
  • Allioni GA; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
  • Silva GD; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
  • Telles JPM; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 91: 105868, 2024 Sep 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260224
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Over the last years, multiple studies have been dedicated to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment options for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). However, there is a wide variety of endpoints employed across these studies. Our goal is to conduct a systematic review describing the endpoints utilized in studies related to NMOSD.

METHODS:

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to May 2023, to identify studies analyzing treatment options in patients with NMOSD. We collected data on baseline study characteristics and all efficacy outcomes available.

RESULTS:

We included 127 studies and identified approximately 40 different efficacy endpoints, categorized into 1) relapse, 2) disability, 3) visual acuity, and 4) surrogate outcomes. Most studies were retrospective (54.3 %) and aimed at attack prevention (81.4 %). The most common relapse-related outcomes were annualized relapse rate (73.2 %), followed by relapse rate (50.4 %), and relapse-free rate (36.2 %). The relapse definition also varied widely among studies, with only 73 (57.4 %) studies explicitly addressing the definition used. The most common disability outcome was the Expanded Disability Scale (97.6 %), followed by the Modified Rankin Scale (7.9 %). Visual Acuity Score was employed in 14.2 % of studies, followed by Visual Evoked Potentials (6.3 %). Imaging was the most common surrogate (20.5 %), followed by the fraction of B cells (18.1 %).

CONCLUSION:

Publications were heterogeneous in measuring efficacy, with different use of endpoints and relapse definitions. Standardization across studies would improve data analysis and application in clinical practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands