Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current practice, trends and attitudes of rheumatologists towards glucocorticoids use for rheumatoid arthritis (GURANTEE): a national cross-sectional survey across China.
Xie, Wenhui; Huang, Hong; Geng, Yan; Fan, Yong; Zhang, Zhuoli.
Affiliation
  • Xie W; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
  • Huang H; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
  • Geng Y; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
  • Fan Y; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China. zhuoli.zhang@126.com.
Rheumatol Int ; 2024 Sep 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261371
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To investigate current practices, changes, and perceptions of rheumatologists regarding GC use in RA patients.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between April and August 2023. Rheumatologists from 31 province-level regions of Mainland China were invited to participate. Chi-squared tests were adopted to investigate the differences by sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS:

1,717 rheumatologists from 598 hospitals completed the survey with a response rate of 92%. Up to 60% of participants expressed currently infrequent initiation of GC co-therapy with csDMARDs (hardly ever 7.0%; occasionally 24.6%; sometimes 29.1%), accompanied by a decline of frequency over time reported in 64.2%. Regarding attitudes towards bridging therapy with GC, 604 (35.2%) participants supported this approach, 468 (27.3%) opposed it, and 645 (37.6%) remained inconclusive. Time to GC discontinuation in context of csDMARDs was commonly reported within 6 months in current practice which has been narrowed over time. Reasons for chronic GC use were mostly reported due to suboptimal disease control, followed by the need of RA complications, and pre-existing comorbidities. After failure of GC cessation, majority of respondents (84.4%) would escalate RA therapy (commonly by addition of JAK inhibitors, TNF inhibitors), which usually or often facilitated the GC cessation. The most frequently reported advantages and weaknesses of GC were rapid and strong efficacy, adverse events, respectively. Regarding long-term low-dose GC use for RA, the percentage of respondents who supported, opposed, or depended on the situation were 15.9%, 17.2%, and 66.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current data demonstrate that GC initiation for RA treatment is not as frequent as before and the awareness of GC discontinuation is growing in current practice. Attitudes towards GC co-therapy with csDMARDs vary considerably and long-term low-dose GC use remain situation dependent.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rheumatol Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rheumatol Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Germany