Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient comfort with sexual orientation and gender identity questions in adult congenital cardiology clinics.
Cook, Stephen C; Deb, Brototo; Pastor, Tony; Hobson, Clare; Walsh, Kaitlyn; Ofner, Susan; Salciccioli, Katherine; Gonzalez, Vincent; Reardon, Leigh C; Carazo, Matthew.
Affiliation
  • Cook SC; Indiana University Adult Congenital Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Deb B; Medstar Georgetown University - Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Pastor T; Yale Adult Congenital Heart Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Hobson C; Boston Adult Congenital Heart Program, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Walsh K; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Ofner S; Indiana University Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Salciccioli K; Adult Congenital Heart Program at Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gonzalez V; Adult Congenital Heart Program at Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Reardon LC; Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Carazo M; Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Cardiol Young ; : 1-8, 2024 Sep 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39267597
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data creates barriers for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people in health care. Barriers to SOGI data collection include physician misperception that patients do not want to answer these questions and discomfort asking SOGI questions. This study aimed to assess patient comfort towards SOGI questions across five quaternary care adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) centres.

METHODS:

A survey administered to ACHD patients (≥18 years) asked (1) two-step gender identity and birth sex, (2) acceptance of SOGI data, and (3) the importance for ACHD physicians to know SOGI data. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences among demographic groups and logistic regression modelled agreement with statement of patient disclosure of SOGI improving patient-physician communication.

RESULTS:

Among 322 ACHD patients, 82% identified as heterosexual and 16% identified as LGBTQ+, across the age ranges 18-29 years (39.4%), 30-49 years (47.8%), 50-64 years (8.7%), and > 65 years (4.0%). Respondents (90.4%) felt comfortable answering SOGI questions. Respondents with bachelor's/higher education were more likely to "agree" that disclosure of SOGI improves patient-physician communication compared to those with less than bachelor's education (OR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.41, 4.25; p = .0015).

CONCLUSION:

These findings suggest that in this largely heterosexual population, SOGI data collection is unlikely to cause patient discomfort. Respondents with higher education were twice as likely to agree that SOGI disclosure improves patient-physician communication. The inclusion of SOGI data in future studies will provide larger samples of underrepresented minorities (e.g. LGBTQ+ population), thereby reducing healthcare disparities within the field of cardiovascular research.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cardiol Young Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cardiol Young Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom