Unattended versus conventional blood pressure measurements in hospitalized hypertensive patients.
Blood Press Monit
; 2024 Sep 17.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39282815
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
This study aims to compare the differences between unattended and conventional blood pressure measurements in hospitalized hypertensive patients.METHODS:
In fall of 2019, hypertensive patients at Ruijin Hospital underwent two rounds of unattended and conventional (nurse-monitored) blood pressure measurement. Both rounds used the same electronic blood pressure monitor with measurements taken three times, 30â s apart. Comparison was made using intra-class correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired t-tests, etc.RESULTS:
Among the 92 subjects in the study, the median age was 50 years old, with women accounting for 33.7%. Among the subjects, the median duration of hypertension was 8.0 years. The prevalence of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and stroke were 26.1%, 5.4%, and 6.5%, respectively. Whether unattended or conventional measurements were taken first, the average blood pressure measured first was slightly higher than the one measured later, but the difference was within 1-2â mmHg. Except that the average DBP during the round of conventional blood pressure measurements was significantly reduced by 1.6â mmHg compared to the conventional DBP, there were no other significant differences. Subgroup analysis by age, gender, BMI, and diabetes showed no significant difference in blood pressure measurement results between unattended and conventional methods.CONCLUSION:
No significant difference was observed between unattended and conventional methods of blood pressure measurement in hospitalized hypertensive patients. Unattended blood pressure measurement can be adopted as the current standard for blood pressure management in hospitalized patients.
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Language:
En
Journal:
Blood Press Monit
/
Blood press. monit
/
Blood pressure monitoring
Journal subject:
ANGIOLOGIA
Year:
2024
Document type:
Article
Country of publication:
United kingdom