Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinicopathological and molecular differences between stage IV screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Flemish screening program.
Neefs, Isabelle; Tran, Thuy Ngan; Ferrari, Allegra; Janssens, Sharon; Van Herck, Koen; Op de Beeck, Ken; Van Camp, Guy; Peeters, Marc; Fransen, Erik; Hoeck, Sarah; Van Hal, Guido.
Affiliation
  • Neefs I; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
  • Tran TN; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Ferrari A; Research group on Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Janssens S; Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium.
  • Van Herck K; Research group on Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Op de Beeck K; Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Van Camp G; Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Peeters M; Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Fransen E; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
  • Hoeck S; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Van Hal G; Center of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1409196, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39286015
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Interval cancer (IC) is an important quality indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Previously, we found that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) ICs are more common in women, older age, right-sided tumors, and advanced stage. Here, we extended our existing stage IV patient cohort with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, to identify factors associated with FIT-IC.

Methods:

Logistic regression models were fit to identify variables associated with the odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Multivariate models were corrected for gender, age, and location.

Results:

A total of 292 screen-detected (SD) CRCs and 215 FIT-IC CRCs were included. FIT-IC CRC had 5 fold higher odds to be a neuroendocrine (NET) tumor and 2.5 fold higher odds to have lymphovascular invasion. Interestingly, some variables lost significance upon accounting for location. Thus, tumor location is a critical covariate that should always be included when evaluating factors related to FIT-IC.

Conclusions:

We identified NETs and lymphovascular invasion as factors associated with increased odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Moreover, we highlight the importance of tumor location as a covariate in evaluating FIT-IC related factors. More research across all stages is needed to clarify how these insights might help to optimize the Flemish CRC screening program.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium Country of publication: Switzerland