Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis.
Bogaert, Brenda; Crevier, Marie-Josée; Roth, Cindy; Jox, Ralf J; Barazzetti, Gaia.
Affiliation
  • Bogaert B; Institut des humanités en médecine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. brenda.bogaert@chuv.ch.
  • Crevier MJ; Unité de consentement à la recherche, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Roth C; Unité de consentement à la recherche, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Jox RJ; Institut des humanités en médecine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Barazzetti G; Gaia Barazzetti, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Community Genet ; 2024 Sep 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39292430
ABSTRACT
This article elaborates research participant perspectives on the communication of individual research results from genomic analyses. While most analyses focus on how to communicate results from the perspectives of clinicians or researchers, there is insufficient data on user perspectives and how this information may be used, valued, and interpreted by patients and their families. The concept of personal utility, which considers factors related to quality of life, including on how information may impact the person's future decisions, has been shown to be particularly relevant to understand research participant perspectives and to move beyond clinical and analytic utility factors such as mortality and morbidity. This article draws from qualitative research of research participants awaiting genomic results in the case of sudden cardiac death. Our results show perspectives of personal utility in communication of genomic results, including cognitive, behavioral, and affective outcomes. Cognitive outcomes include gain of information, improved knowledge of etiology and inheritance characteristics, and curiosity for what might be found. Behavioral outcomes include being able to plan life decisions, while affective outcomes include various coping strategies used. We will also discuss the value of knowing negative results and incidental findings from the research participant's perspective. This contribution gives suggestions on best practices to guide genome analysis returns, including incorporating participant wishes on individualized communication at the consent stage; developing relational autonomy approaches; and engaging them throughout the research trajectory.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Community Genet Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Community Genet Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: Germany