Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing the implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in community-based nursing homes.
Mayoryk, Stephanie; O'Hara, Lyndsay M; Robinson, Gwen L; Lydecker, Alison D; Slifka, Kara Jacobs; Jones, Heather; Roghmann, Mary-Claire.
Affiliation
  • Mayoryk S; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
  • O'Hara LM; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
  • Robinson GL; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
  • Lydecker AD; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
  • Slifka KJ; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
  • Jones H; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
  • Roghmann MC; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Electronic address: mroghmann@som.umaryland.edu.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Sep 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39307397
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) recommends using gowns and gloves for certain nursing home residents during specific high-contact care activities associated with multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. Though EBP is included in CDC guidance as an MDRO control strategy, optimal implementation approaches remain unclear.

METHODS:

We implemented a quality improvement initiative using the 4E process model (Engagement, Education, Execution, and Evaluation) to optimize EBP implementation in four Maryland nursing homes. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare personnel (HCP) occurred to understand EBP acceptability.

RESULTS:

Glove use during high-contact care increased from 85% in the baseline to 97% during the intervention (p<0.01). Gown use increased from 27% to 78% (p<0.01). Accuracy of identifying residents eligible for EBP improved from 63% to 99% (p<0.01). Of 780 residents observed, one-third met EBP indications - MDRO colonization (21%), indwelling medical device (14%), and/or chronic wound (10%). The most noted facilitator to EBP implementation included HCP perception that EBP reduces MDRO transmission to other residents and staff. The most noted barrier was uncomfortable gowns.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation was complex and required comprehensive assessments of barriers and facilitators within each facility. HCP interviews identified common barriers and facilitators of EBP that can inform future EBP implementation projects.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States