Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning.
Thomsen, Kenneth; Jalaboi, Raluca; Winther, Ole; Lomholt, Hans Bredsted; Lorentzen, Henrik F; Høgsberg, Trine; Egekvist, Henrik; Hedelund, Lene; Jørgensen, Sofie; Frost, Sanne; Bertelsen, Trine; Iversen, Lars.
Affiliation
  • Thomsen K; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Jalaboi R; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Winther O; Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Lomholt HB; Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Lorentzen HF; Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Høgsberg T; Department of Biology, Bioinformatics Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Egekvist H; Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Hedelund L; Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Jørgensen S; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Frost S; Hudlaege Henrik Egekvist, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Bertelsen T; Hudlaegeklinikken Hobro, Hobro, Denmark.
  • Iversen L; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lasers Surg Med ; 2024 Sep 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39308029
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Hirsutism is a widespread condition affecting 5%-15% of females. Laser treatment of hirsutism has the best long-term effect. Patients with nonpigmented or nonterminal hairs are not eligible for laser treatment, and the current patient journey needed to establish eligibility for laser hair removal is problematic in many health-care systems.

METHODS:

In this study, we compared the ability to assess eligibility for laser hair removal of health-care professionals and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models.

RESULTS:

The CNN ensemble model, synthesized from the outputs of five individual CNN models, reached an eligibility assessment accuracy of 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.60) and a κ of 0.20 (95% CI 0.13-0.27), taking a consensus expert label as reference. For comparison, board-certified dermatologists achieved a mean accuracy of 0.48 (95% CI 0.44-0.52) and a mean κ of 0.26 (95% CI 0.22-0.31). Intra-rater analysis of board-certified dermatologists yielded κ in the 0.32 (95% CI 0.24-0.40) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.74) range.

CONCLUSION:

Current assessment of eligibility for laser hair removal is challenging. Developing a laser hair removal eligibility assessment tool based on deep learning that performs on a par with trained dermatologists is feasible. Such a model may potentially reduce workload, increase quality and effectiveness, and facilitate equal health-care access. However, to achieve true clinical generalizability, prospective randomized clinical intervention studies are needed.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lasers Surg Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lasers Surg Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United States