Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of risk factors on intervened and non-intervened coronary lesions.
Sheng, Xincheng; Yang, Gan; Zhang, Qing; Zhou, Yong; Pu, Jun.
Affiliation
  • Sheng X; Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University 160 Pu Jian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
  • Yang G; Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University 160 Pu Jian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
  • Zhang Q; Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University 160 Pu Jian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
  • Zhou Y; Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University 160 Pu Jian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
  • Pu J; Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University 160 Pu Jian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
Am J Cardiovasc Dis ; 14(4): 255-266, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39309112
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In-stent restenosis (ISR) and aggravated non-intervened coronary lesions (ANL) are two pivotal aspects of disease progression in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Established risk factors for both include hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and smoking. However, there is limited research on the comparative risk factors for the progression of these two aspects of progression. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different impacts of identical risk factors on ISR and ANL.

METHODS:

This study enrolled a total of 510 patients with multiple coronary artery lesions who underwent repeated coronary angiography (CAG). All patients had previously undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and presented non-intervened coronary lesions in addition to the previously intervened vessels.

RESULTS:

After data analysis, it was determined that HbA1c (OR 1.229, 95% CI 1.022-1.477, P=0.028) and UA (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.005, P=0.024) were identified as independent risk factors for ISR. Furthermore, HbA1c (OR 1.215, 95% CI 1.010-1.460, P=0.039), Scr (OR 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.017, P=0.009), and ApoB (OR 1.017, 95% CI 1.006-1.029, P=0.004) were identified as independent risk factors for ANL. The distribution of multiple blood lipid levels differed between the ANL only group and the ISR only group. Non-HDL-C (2.17 mmol/L vs. 2.44 mmol/L, P=0.007) and ApoB (63.5 mg/dL vs. 71.0 mg/dL, P=0.011) exhibited significantly higher values in the ANL only group compared to the ISR only group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Blood glucose levels and chronic kidney disease were identified as independent risk factors for both ISR and ANL, while elevated lipid levels were only significantly associated with ANL. In patients with non-intervened coronary lesions following PCI, it is crucial to assess the concentration of non-HDL-C and ApoB as they serve as significant risk factors.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States