Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Outcomes Requiring Additional Intervention Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.
Limthongkul, Worawat; Chaiwongwattana, Bandid; Kerr, Stephen J; Tanasansomboon, Teerachat; Kotheeranurak, Vit; Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn; Singhatanadgige, Weerasak.
Affiliation
  • Limthongkul W; Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Chaiwongwattana B; Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kerr SJ; Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Tanasansomboon T; Biostatistics Excellence Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kotheeranurak V; Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Yingsakmongkol W; Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Singhatanadgige W; Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Neurospine ; 21(3): 845-855, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39363464
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive procedure for stabilizing the spine and indirectly decompressing the neural elements. There is sparse data on unsatisfactory outcomes that require additional interventions (surgery or intervention) after OLIF. This study aimed to identify the causes, and risk factors of these reintervention.

METHODS:

This was a single-center retrospective study of the patients who underwent the OLIF procedure from June 2016 to March 2023. Several clinical and radiographic parameters were studied. We also analyzed associations between several potential risk factors and the reintervention following OLIF.

RESULTS:

A total of 231 patients were included. Over an average of 2.5 years of follow-up, 28 patients (12.1%) required a reintervention. Adjacent segment disease (ASD) was the most common cause of reintervention. The risk factors associated with reintervention were previous surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-16.33; p=0.02) and high preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08; p=0.03). Although increasing the duration of follow-up was not statistically significant, the 95% CI was consistent with an increased risk of reintervention with longer follow-up (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94-1.50).

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that patients with prior lumbar surgery and high preoperative ODI scores were more likely to require additional intervention after the OLIF procedure. In addition, an increasing duration of follow-up was associated with an increased risk of reintervention. The most common reason for reintervention was ASD after OLIF.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neurospine Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Thailand Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neurospine Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Thailand Country of publication: