Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of the 2018 Revised Version of AO/OTA Classification for Femoral Shaft Fractures.
Park, Jung-Wee; Jo, Woo-Lam; Park, Byung Kyu; Go, Jong Jin; Han, Minji; Chun, Sungha; Lee, Young-Kyun.
Affiliation
  • Park JW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • Jo WL; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park BK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Go JJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • Han M; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • Chun S; Department of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee YK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 16(5): 688-693, 2024 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39364112
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system for diaphyseal fracture has been recently revised to refine and enhance the accuracy of fracture categorization. This study aimed to investigate the interobserver reliability of the new AO/OTA classification and to compare it with the older version in femoral shaft fractures.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 139 patients (mean age, 43.8 ± 19.5 years; 92 men and 47 women) with femoral shaft fractures who were treated from 2003 to 2017. Four well-trained observers independently classified each fracture following the previous and revised AO/OTA classification system. We calculated the Fleiss kappa for the interobserver reliability.

Results:

The previous classification showed the kappa value of 0.580 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.547-0.613), and the revised version showed 0.528 (95% CI, 0.504-0.552). Both the old and the revised versions showed moderate reliability.

Conclusions:

Our study highlights the moderate interobserver reliability of both the previous and new AO/OTA classification systems for diaphyseal femur fractures. These findings emphasize the importance of standardized systems in clinical decision-making and underscore the need for ongoing education and collaboration to enhance fracture classification.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femoral Fractures Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Orthop Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femoral Fractures Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Orthop Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: