Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
2024 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care.
Martin-Gill, Christian; Patterson, P Daniel; Richards, Christopher T; Misra, Anjali J; Potts, Benjamin T; Cash, Rebecca E.
Affiliation
  • Martin-Gill C; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Patterson PD; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Richards CT; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Misra AJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Potts BT; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Cash RE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-15, 2024 Oct 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39373357
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) are widely recognized as valuable tools to aggregate and translate scientific knowledge into clinical care. High-quality EBGs can also serve as important components of dissemination and implementation efforts focused on educating emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians about current evidence-based prehospital clinical care practices and operations. We aimed to perform the third biennial systematic review of prehospital EBGs to identify and assess the quality of prehospital EBGs published since 2021.

METHODS:

We systematically searched Ovid Medline and EMBASE from January 1, 2021, to June 6, 2023, for publications relevant to prehospital care, based on an organized review of the literature, and focused on providing recommendations for clinical care or operations. Included guidelines were appraised using the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines and scored using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool.

RESULTS:

We identified 33 new guidelines addressing clinical and operational topics of EMS medicine. The most addressed EMS core content areas were time-life critical conditions (n = 17, 51.5%), special clinical considerations (n = 15, 45%), and injury (n = 12, 36%). Seven (21%) guidelines included all elements of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines, including the full reporting of a systematic review of the evidence. Guideline appraisals by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool demonstrated modest compliance to reporting recommendations and similar overall quality compared to previously identified guidelines (mean overall domain score 67%, SD 12%), with Domain 5 ("Applicability") scoring the lowest of the six AGREE II domains (mean score of 53%, SD 13%).

CONCLUSIONS:

This updated systematic review identified and appraised recent guidelines addressing prehospital care and identifies important targets for education of EMS personnel. Continued opportunities exist for prehospital guideline developers to include comprehensive evidence-based reporting into guideline development to facilitate widespread implementation of high-quality EBGs in EMS systems and incorporate the best available scientific evidence into initial education and continued competency activities.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom