Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study on Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns: 5-Year Results for Lithia-Zirconia Glass-Ceramic Restorations.
Rinke, Sven; Schmidt, Emanuel; Leha, Andreas; Roediger, Matthias; Ziebolz, Dirk.
Affiliation
  • Rinke S; Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Schmidt E; Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Leha A; Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Roediger M; Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Ziebolz D; Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 2024 Oct 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39381856
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass-ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1-C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan-Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1-C3).

RESULTS:

Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR C1 + C2 100%; C3 71%; 95% confidence interval [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, p = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.

CONCLUSIONS:

LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Esthet Restor Dent / J. esthet. restor. dent / Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Esthet Restor Dent / J. esthet. restor. dent / Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom