This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Transcriptional Difference between SARS-COV-2 and other Human Coronaviruses Revealed by Sub-genomic RNA Profiling
Preprint
in English
| bioRxiv
| ID: ppbiorxiv-043224
ABSTRACT
BackgroundFundamental to viral biology is identification and annotation of viral genes and their function. Determining the level of coronavirus gene expression is inherently difficult due to the positive stranded RNA genome and the identification of sub-genomic RNAs (sgRNAs) that are required for expression of most viral genes. In the COVID-19 epidemic so far, few genomic studies have looked at viral sgRNAs and none have systematically examined the sgRNA profiles of large numbers of SARS-CoV2 datasets in conjuction with data for other coronaviruses. ResultsWe developed a bioinformatic pipeline to analyze the sgRNA profiles of coronaviruses and applied it to 588 individual samples from 20 independent studies, covering more than 10 coronavirus species. Our result showed that SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV each had a core sgRNA repertoire generated via a canonical mechanism. Novel sgRNAs that encode peptides with evolutionarily conserved structures were identified in several coronaviruses and were expressed in vitro and in vivo. Two novel peptides may have direct functional relevance to disease, by alluding interferon responses and disrupting IL17E (IL25) signaling. Relevant to coronavirus infectivity and transmission, we also observed that the level of Spike sgRNAs were significantly higher in-vivo than in-vitro, while the opposite held true for the Nucleocapside protein. ConclusionsOur results greatly expanded the predicted number of coronaviruses proteins and identified potential viral peptide suggested to be involved in viral virulence. These methods and findings shed new light on coronavirus biology and provides a valuable resource for future genomic studies of coronaviruses.
cc_by_nd
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
bioRxiv
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Language:
English
Year:
2020
Document type:
Preprint