Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies in Dogs and Cats in the United Kingdom
Shirley Smith; Enyia Anderson; Cintia Cansado Utrilla; Tessa Prince; Sean Farrell; Bethaney Brant; Stephen Smyth; Peter-John Noble; Gina Pinchbeck; Nikki Marshall; Larry Roberts; Grant Hughes; Alan Radford; Edward I Patterson.
Affiliation
  • Shirley Smith; University of Liverpool
  • Enyia Anderson; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • Cintia Cansado Utrilla; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • Tessa Prince; University of Liverpool
  • Sean Farrell; University of Liverpool
  • Bethaney Brant; University of Liverpool
  • Stephen Smyth; University of Liverpool
  • Peter-John Noble; University of Liverpool
  • Gina Pinchbeck; University of Liverpool
  • Nikki Marshall; IDEXX Laboratories
  • Larry Roberts; IDEXX Laboratories
  • Grant Hughes; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • Alan Radford; University of Liverpool
  • Edward I Patterson; Brock University
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-449594
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
Companion animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and sporadic cases of pet infections have occurred in the United Kingdom. Here we present the first large-scale serological survey of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies in dogs and cats in the UK. Results are reported for 688 sera (454 canine, 234 feline) collected by a large veterinary diagnostic laboratory for routine haematology during three time periods; pre-COVID-19 (January 2020), during the first wave of UK human infections (April-May 2020) and during the second wave of UK human infections (September 2020-February 2021). Both pre-COVID-19 sera and those from the first wave tested negative. However, in sera collected during the second wave, 1.4% (n=4) of dogs and 2.2% (n=2) cats tested positive for neutralising antibodies. The low numbers of animals testing positive suggests pet animals are unlikely to be a major reservoir for human infection in the UK. However, continued surveillance of in-contact susceptible animals should be performed as part of ongoing population health surveillance initiatives.
License
cc_by
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: bioRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: bioRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...