Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation and Establishment of a SARS-CoV-2 Lentivirus Surrogate Neutralization Assay as a pre-screening tool for the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test
John Merluza; Johnny Ung; Kai Makowski; Alyssia Robinson; Kathy J Manguiat; Nicole Mueller; Jonathan Audet; Julie Chih-yu Chen; James Eric Strong; Heidi Wood; Alexander Bello.
Affiliation
  • John Merluza; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Johnny Ung; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Kai Makowski; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Alyssia Robinson; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Kathy J Manguiat; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Nicole Mueller; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Jonathan Audet; National Microbiology Laboratory
  • Julie Chih-yu Chen; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • James Eric Strong; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Heidi Wood; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Alexander Bello; National Microbiology Laboratory
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-507876
ABSTRACT
Neutralization assays are important in understanding and quantifying neutralizing antibody responses towards SARS-CoV-2. The SARS-CoV-2 Lentivirus Surrogate Neutralization Assay (SCLSNA) can be used in biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) laboratories and has been shown to be a reliable, alternative approach to the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). In this study, we optimized and validated the SCLSNA to assess its ability as a comparator and pre-screening method to support the PRNT. Comparability between the PRNT and SCLSNA was determined through clinical sensitivity and specificity evaluations. Clinical sensitivity and specificity produced acceptable results with 100% (95% CI 94-100) specificity and 100% (95% CI 94-100) sensitivity against ancestral Wuhan spike pseudotyped lentivirus. The sensitivity and specificity against B.1.1.7 spike pseudotyped lentivirus resulted in 88.3% (95% CI 77.8 to 94.2) and 100% (95% CI 94-100), respectively. Assay precision measuring intra-assay variability produced acceptable results for High (1[≥] 640 PRNT50), Mid (1160 PRNT50) and Low (140 PRNT50) antibody titer concentration ranges based on the PRNT50, with %CV of 14.21, 12.47, and 13.28 respectively. Intermediate precision indicated acceptable ranges for the High and Mid concentrations, with %CV of 15.52 and 16.09, respectively. However, the Low concentration did not meet the acceptance criteria with a %CV of 26.42. Acceptable ranges were found in the robustness evaluation for both intra-assay and inter-assay variability. In summary, the validation parameters tested met the acceptance criteria, making the SCLSNA method fit for its intended purpose, which can be used to support the PRNT.
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: bioRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: bioRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint
...