This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Benefits and Risks of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in The Treatment of Viral Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Placebo Randomized Controlled Trials
Preprint
in En
| PREPRINT-MEDRXIV
| ID: ppmedrxiv-20064295
ABSTRACT
Background and ObjectiveRecently, in the scramble to find drugs to treat COVID-19, chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have rapidly gained the publics attention. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ in the treatment of viral diseases. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Clinical Trials Registries, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CQVIP, and Preprint Servers through April 4, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ against viral infection. We analyzed pooled data on the overall efficacy, the relative risks over the placebo, and the prevalence of adverse events. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed to evaluate the random errors in the meta-analysis. Potential moderators of drug-placebo efficacy differences were analyzed by meta-regression. ResultsThe analysis included 11 RCTs with 2613 adult patients. Both the plasma viral load (standard mean difference 0.29, 95% CI -1.19 - 1.76, P = 0.70) and the improvement of clinical symptoms (odds ratio 2.36, 95% CI 0.81 - 6.92, P = 0.11) were not different between the intervention and placebo arm. There was significant heterogeneity for the efficacy assessment, which was primarily explained by the mean patients age and the sample size. Compared to the placebo, CQ and HCQ had increased risk of mild adverse events (risk ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.35 - 1.70, P < 0.05, TSA adjusted 95% CI 1.31 - 2.19), which were statistically significant in nervous, integumentary, and gastrointestinal systems. The most common adverse events were observed in the nervous system, with the pooled prevalence of 31.4 % (95% CI 10.5% - 56.7%). ConclusionsInsufficient data were available to support the antiviral efficacy of CQ and HCQ due to the high heterogeneity caused by patients age. Mild side effects are expected for the current antiviral dose regimens of CQ and HCQ. Treatment outcomes may be enhanced by better-selected patients based on age and well-controlled adverse events. This meta-analysis was registered on OSF (ID https//osf.io/386aw)
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text:
1
Collection:
09-preprints
Database:
PREPRINT-MEDRXIV
Type of study:
Experimental_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Rct
/
Review
Language:
En
Year:
2020
Document type:
Preprint