Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of a knowledge-driven risk calculator for critical illness in COVID-19 patients
Amos Cahan; Tamar Gottesman; Michal Tzuchman Katz; Roee Masad; Gal Azulay; Dror Dicker; Aliza Zeidman; Evgeny Berkov; Gal Sahaf Levin; Boaz Tadmor; Shaul Lev.
Affiliation
  • Amos Cahan; Kahun Medical
  • Tamar Gottesman; Hasharon campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
  • Michal Tzuchman Katz; Kahun Medical Ltd
  • Roee Masad; Kahun Medical Ltd
  • Gal Azulay; Kahun Medical Ltd.
  • Dror Dicker; Hasharon campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
  • Aliza Zeidman; Hasharon campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
  • Evgeny Berkov; Hasharon campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
  • Gal Sahaf Levin; The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Boaz Tadmor; Research Authority, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
  • Shaul Lev; General Intensive Care Unit, HasHasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, I
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20103754
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
Facing the rapidly spreading novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), evidence to inform decision-making at both the clinical and policy-making level is highly needed. Based on the results of a study by Petrilli et al, we have developed a calculator using patient data at admission to predict the risk of critical illness (intensive care unit admission, use of mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice, or death). We report a retrospective validation of the risk calculator on 145 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 to a single hospital in Israel. Of the 18 patients with critical illness, 17 were correctly identified by the model(sensitivity 94.4%, 95% CI, 72.7% to 99.9%; specificity 81.9%, 95% CI, 74.1% to 88.2%). Of the 127 patients with non-critical illness, 104 were correctly identified. This, despite considerable differences between the original and validation study populations. Our results show that data from published knowledge can be used to provide reliable, patient level, automated risk assessment, potentially reducing the cognitive burden on physicians and helping policy makers better prepare for future needs.
License
cc_by_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...