This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Development and validation of a knowledge-driven risk calculator for critical illness in COVID-19 patients
Preprint
in English
| medRxiv
| ID: ppmedrxiv-20103754
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
Facing the rapidly spreading novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), evidence to inform decision-making at both the clinical and policy-making level is highly needed. Based on the results of a study by Petrilli et al, we have developed a calculator using patient data at admission to predict the risk of critical illness (intensive care unit admission, use of mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice, or death). We report a retrospective validation of the risk calculator on 145 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 to a single hospital in Israel. Of the 18 patients with critical illness, 17 were correctly identified by the model(sensitivity 94.4%, 95% CI, 72.7% to 99.9%; specificity 81.9%, 95% CI, 74.1% to 88.2%). Of the 127 patients with non-critical illness, 104 were correctly identified. This, despite considerable differences between the original and validation study populations. Our results show that data from published knowledge can be used to provide reliable, patient level, automated risk assessment, potentially reducing the cognitive burden on physicians and helping policy makers better prepare for future needs.
cc_by_nd
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
medRxiv
Type of study:
Observational study
/
Prognostic study
Language:
English
Year:
2020
Document type:
Preprint