This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Point of care lung ultrasound is useful when screening for CoVid-19 in Emergency Department patients.
Preprint
in English
| medRxiv
| ID: ppmedrxiv-20123836
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCoVid-19 can be a life-threatening lung disease or a trivial upper respiratory infection depending on whether the alveoli are involved. Emergency department (ED) screening in symptomatic patients with normal vital signs is frequently limited to oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. We tested the null hypothesis that patients being screened for CoVid-19 in the ED with normal vital signs and without hypoxia would have a point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) consistent with CoVid-19 less than 2% of the time. MethodsO_ST_ABSSubjectsC_ST_ABSSubjects were identified from ED ultrasound logs. Inclusion criteriaAge 14 years or older with symptoms prompting ED screening for CoVid-19. Exclusion criteriaKnown congestive heart failure or other chronic lung condition likely to cause excessive B lines on LUS. InterventionStructured blinded ultrasound review and chart review AnalysisWe used a two-sided exact hypothesis test for binomial random variables. We also measured LUS diagnostic performance using computed tomography as the gold standard. ResultsWe reviewed 77 charts; 49 met inclusion criteria. Vital signs were normal in 30/49 patients; 10 (33%) of these patients had LUS consistent with CoVid-19. We rejected the null hypothesis (p-value < 0.001). The treating physicians interpretation of their own point of care lung ultrasounds had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 75%, 100%) and specificity of 80% (95% CI 68%, 89%). ConclusionLUS has a meaningful detection rate for CoVid-19 in symptomatic ED patients with normal vital signs. We recommend at least LUS be used in addition to PCR testing when screening symptomatic ED patients for CoVid-19. Capsule What is knownAuscultation and chest x-ray are insufficient to screen for lung involvement when SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected. Point of care lung ultrasound is widely available, safer, and less resource intensive than CT imaging. What we foundIn symptomatic patients presenting to the ED even those with normal vital signs had point of care lung ultrasound evidence of alveolar level involvement 33%of patients. Point of care lung ultrasound was 100% sensitive and 80% specific compared to CT (reference standard) when evaluating patients for Covid-19. What this addsPoint of care lung ultrasound or similar imaging should performed when screening symptomatic patients in whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected.
cc_by
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
medRxiv
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Experimental_studies
/
Rct
Language:
English
Year:
2020
Document type:
Preprint