Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are women leaders significantly better at controlling the contagion?
Soumik Purkayastha; Maxwell Salvatore; Bhramar Mukherjee.
Affiliation
  • Soumik Purkayastha; University of Michigan
  • Maxwell Salvatore; University of Michigan
  • Bhramar Mukherjee; University of Michigan
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20124487
ABSTRACT
Recent media articles have suggested that women-led countries are doing better in terms of their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine an ensemble of public health metrics to assess the control of COVID-19 epidemic in women- versus men-led countries worldwide based on data available up to June 3. The median of the distribution of median time-varying effective reproduction number for women- and men-led countries were 0.89 and 1.14 respectively with the 95% two-sample bootstrap-based confidence interval for the difference (women - men) being [- 0.34, 0.02]. In terms of scale of testing, the median percentage of population tested were 3.28% (women), 1.59% (men) [95% CI (-1.29%, 3.60%)] with test positive rates of 2.69% (women) and 4.94% (men) respectively. It appears that though statistically not significant, countries led by women have an edge over countries led by men in terms of public health metrics for controlling the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. One Sentence SummaryWe quantitatively compare countries led by women with countries led by men in terms of public health metrics for controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus.
License
cc_by
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...