Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bayesian nowcasting with adjustment for delayed and incomplete reporting to estimate COVID-19 infections in the United States
Melanie H Chitwood; Marcus Russi; Kenneth Gunasekera; Joshua Havumaki; Fayette Klaassen; Virginia E. Pitzer; Joshua A Salomon; Nicole Swartwood; Joshua L Warren; Daniel Weinberger; Ted Cohen; Nicolas A Menzies.
Affiliation
  • Melanie H Chitwood; Yale School of Public Health
  • Marcus Russi; Yale School of Public Health
  • Kenneth Gunasekera; Yale School of Public Health
  • Joshua Havumaki; Yale School of Public Health
  • Fayette Klaassen; Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
  • Virginia E. Pitzer; Yale School of Public Health
  • Joshua A Salomon; Stanford University
  • Nicole Swartwood; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Joshua L Warren; Yale School of Public Health
  • Daniel Weinberger; Yale School of Public Health
  • Ted Cohen; Yale School of Public Health
  • Nicolas A Menzies; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20133983
ABSTRACT
Reported COVID-19 cases and deaths provide a delayed and incomplete picture of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United States (US). Accurate estimates of both the timing and magnitude of infections are needed to characterize viral transmission dynamics and better understand COVID- 19 disease burden. We estimated time trends in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and other COVID-19 outcomes for every county in the US, from the first reported COVID-19 case in January 13, 2020 through January 1, 2021. To do so we employed a Bayesian modeling approach that explicitly accounts for reporting delays and variation in case ascertainment, and generates daily estimates of incident SARS-CoV-2 infections on the basis of reported COVID-19 cases and deaths. The model is freely available as the covidestim R package. Nationally, we estimated there had been 49 million symptomatic COVID-19 cases and 400,718 COVID-19 deaths by the end of 2020, and that 27% of the US population had been infected. The results also demonstrate wide county-level variability in the timing and magnitude of incidence, with local epidemiological trends differing substantially from state or regional averages, leading to large differences in the estimated proportion of the population infected by the end of 2020. Our estimates of true COVID-19 related deaths are consistent with independent estimates of excess mortality, and our estimated trends in cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection are consistent with trends in seroprevalence estimates from available antibody testing studies. Reconstructing the underlying incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections across US counties allows for a more granular understanding of disease trends and the potential impact of epidemiological drivers.
License
cc_by_nc
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...