Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analytical and clinical performances of five immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in comparison with neutralization activity
Mario Plebani; Andrea Padoan; Laura Sciacovelli; Francesco Bonfante; Matteo Pagliari; Dania Bozzato; Chiara Cosma; Alessio Bortolami; Davide Negrini; Silvia Zuin.
Affiliation
  • Mario Plebani; University of Padova
  • Andrea Padoan; university of padova
  • Laura Sciacovelli; Azienda Ospedale Universita di Padova
  • Francesco Bonfante; Istituto Zooprofilattico Veneto
  • Matteo Pagliari; Zooprofilattico Veneto
  • Dania Bozzato; Universita di Padova
  • Chiara Cosma; Azienda Ospedale Universita di Padova
  • Alessio Bortolami; Zooprofilattico Veneto
  • Davide Negrini; Universita di Padova
  • Silvia Zuin; Universita di padova
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20166546
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
BackgroundReliable high-throughput serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Abs) are urgently needed for the effective containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it is of crucial importance to understand the strength and duration of immunity after infection, and to make informed decisions concerning the activation or discontinuation of physical distancing restrictions. MethodsIn 184 serum samples from 130 COVID-19 patients and 54 SARS-CoV-2 negative subjects, the analytical and clinical performances of four commercially available chemiluminescent assays (Abbott SARS-Cov-2 IgG, Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2, Ortho SARS-CoV-2 total and IgG) and one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Diesse ENZY-WELL SARS-CoV-2 IgG) were evaluated and compared with the neutralization activity achieved using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). FindingsPrecision results ranged from 0.9% to 11.8% for all assays. Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated linearity of results at concentrations within the cut-off value. Overall, sensitivity ranged from 78.5 to 87.8%, and specificity, from 97.6 to 100%. On limiting the analysis to samples collected 12 days after onset of symptoms, the sensitivity of all assays increased, the highest value (95.2%) being obtained with VITRO Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total and Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The strongest PRNT50 correlation with antibody levels was obtained with ENZY-Well SARS-CoV-2 IgG (rho = 0.541, p < 0.001). InterpretationThe results confirmed that all immunoassays had an excellent specificity, whereas sensitivity varied across immunoassays, depending strongly on the time interval between symptoms onset and sample collection. Further studies should be conducted to achieve a stronger correlation between antibody measurement and PRNT50 in order to obtain useful information for providing effective passive antibody therapy, and developing a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...