Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of PTSD, depression and anxiety in UK frontline health and social care workers during COVID-19.
Talya Greene; Jasmine Harju-Seppanen; Mariam Adjeniji; Charlotte Steel; Nick Grey; Chris R Brewin; Michael A Bloomfield; Jo Billings.
Affiliation
  • Talya Greene; University of Haifa
  • Jasmine Harju-Seppanen; University College London
  • Mariam Adjeniji; University College London
  • Charlotte Steel; University College London
  • Nick Grey; Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
  • Chris R Brewin; University College London
  • Michael A Bloomfield; University College London
  • Jo Billings; University College London
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20216804
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
BackgroundStudies have shown that working in frontline healthcare roles during epidemics and pandemics was associated with PTSD, depression, anxiety, and other mental health disorders. ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to identify demographic, work-related and other predictors for clinically significant PTSD, depression, and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in UK frontline health and social care workers (HSCWs), and to compare rates of distress across different groups of HCSWs working in different roles and settings. MethodsA convenience sample (n=1194) of frontline UK HCSWs completed an online survey during the first wave of the pandemic (27 May - 23 July 2020). Participants worked in UK hospitals, nursing or care homes and other community settings. PTSD was assessed using the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ); Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); Anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). ResultsNearly 58% of respondents met the threshold for clinically significant PTSD, anxiety or depression, and symptom levels were high across occupational groups and settings. Logistic regression analyses found that participants who were concerned about infecting others, who felt they could not talk with their managers, who reported feeling stigmatised and who had not had reliable access to personal protective equipment (PPE) were more likely to meet criteria for a clinically significant mental disorder. Being redeployed during the pandemic, and having had COVID were associated with higher odds for PTSD. Higher household income was associated with reduced odds for a mental disorder. ConclusionsThis study identified predictors of clinically significant distress during COVID-19 and highlights the need for reliable access to PPE and further investigation of barriers to communication between managers and staff.
License
cc_by_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...