Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of prediction models for short term outcome in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study
Paul M.E.L. van Dam; Noortje Zelis; Sander M.J. van Kuijk; Aimee E.M.J.H. Linkens; Renee R.A.G. Bruggemann; Bart Spaetgens; Iwan C.C. van der Horst; Patricia M Stassen.
Affiliation
  • Paul M.E.L. van Dam; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Noortje Zelis; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Sander M.J. van Kuijk; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Aimee E.M.J.H. Linkens; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Renee R.A.G. Bruggemann; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Bart Spaetgens; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Iwan C.C. van der Horst; Maastricht University Medical Center +
  • Patricia M Stassen; Maastricht University Medical Center +
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20238527
ABSTRACT
IntroductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a high burden on the healthcare system and demands information on the outcome early after admission to the emergency department (ED). Previously developed prediction models may assist in triaging patients when allocating healthcare resources. We aimed to assess the value of several prediction models when applied to COVID-19 patients in the ED. MethodsAll consecutive COVID-19 patients who visited the ED of a combined secondary/tertiary care center were included. Prediction models were selected based on their feasibility. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, secondary outcomes were 14-day mortality, and a composite outcome of 30-day mortality and admission to the medium care unit (MCU) or the intensive care unit (ICU). The discriminatory performance of the prediction models was assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsA total of 403 ED patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. Within 30 days, 95 patients died (23.6%), 14-day mortality was 19.1%. Forty-eight patients (11.9%) were admitted to the MCU, 66 patients (16.4%) to the ICU and 152 patients (37.7%) met the composite endpoint. Eleven models were included RISE UP score, 4C mortality score, CURB-65, MEWS, REMS, abbMEDS, SOFA, APACHE II, CALL score, ACP index and Host risk factor score. The RISE UP score and 4C mortality score showed a very good discriminatory performance for 30-day mortality (AUC 0.83 and 0.84 respectively, 95% CI 0.79-0.88 for both), for 14-day mortality (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.88, for both) and for the composite outcome (AUC 0.79 and 0.77 respectively, 95% CI 0.75-0.84). The discriminatory performance of the RISE UP score and 4C mortality score was significantly higher compared to that of the other models. ConclusionThe RISE UP score and 4C mortality score have good discriminatory performance in predicting adverse outcome in ED patients with COVID-19. These prediction models can be used to recognize patients at high risk for short-term poor outcome and may assist in guiding clinical decision-making and allocating healthcare resources.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...