Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-life evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients
Ignacio Torres; Sandrine Poujois; Eliseo Albert; Javier Colomina; David Navarro.
Affiliation
  • Ignacio Torres; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
  • Sandrine Poujois; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
  • Eliseo Albert; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
  • Javier Colomina; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
  • David Navarro; Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20241562
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesThere is limited information on the performance of rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests to identify SARS-CoV-2-infected asymptomatic individuals. In this field study, we evaluated the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (Abbott Diagnostics, Jena, Germany) for the purpose. MethodsA total of 634 individuals (355 female; median age, 37 years; range, 9-87) were enrolled. Household (n=338) contacts were tested at a median of 2 days (range, 1-7) after diagnosis of the index case and non-household contacts (n=296) at a median of 6 days (range, 1-7) after exposure. RAD testing was carried out at the point of care. The RT-PCR test used was the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). ResultsIn total, 79 individuals (12.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR, of whom 38 (48.1%) yielded positive RAD results. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the RAD test was 48.1% (95% CI 37.4-58.9) and 100% (95% CI 99.3-100), respectively. Sensitivity was higher in household (50.8%; 95% CI 38.9-62.5) than in non-household (35.7%; 95% CI16.3-61.2%) contacts. Individuals testing positive by RAD test were more likely (P<0.001) to become symptomatic than their negative counterparts. ConclusionThe Panbio test displays low sensitivity in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients, particularly in non-household contacts. Nonetheless, establishing the optimal timing for upper respiratory tract collection in this group seems imperative to pinpoint test sensitivity.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...