Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterising long-term covid-19: a rapid living systematic review
Melina Michelen; Vincent Cheng; Lakshmi Manoharan; Natalie Elkheir; Drew Dagens; Claire Hastie; Margaret O'Hara; Jake Suett; Dania T Dahmash; Polina Bugaeva; Ishmeala Rigby; Daniel Munblit; Eli Harriss; Amanda Burls; Carol Foote; Janet T Scott; Gail Carson; Piero L Olliaro; Louise Sigfrid; Charitini Stavropoulou.
Affiliation
  • Melina Michelen; City, University of London
  • Vincent Cheng; University of Bristol
  • Lakshmi Manoharan; University of Oxford
  • Natalie Elkheir; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Drew Dagens; University of Oxford
  • Claire Hastie; Long Covid Support
  • Margaret O'Hara; Long Covid Support
  • Jake Suett; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn
  • Dania T Dahmash; 2. ISARIC Global Support Centre, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Polina Bugaeva; Julius-Maximilians-Universitat Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
  • Ishmeala Rigby; 2. ISARIC Global Support Centre, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Daniel Munblit; Imperial College London
  • Eli Harriss; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Amanda Burls; City, University of London
  • Carol Foote; Freelance
  • Janet T Scott; MRC-University of Glasgow Center for Virus research
  • Gail Carson; University of Oxford
  • Piero L Olliaro; University of Oxford
  • Louise Sigfrid; University of Oxford
  • Charitini Stavropoulou; City, University of London
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20246025
ABSTRACT
BackgroundWhile it is now apparent clinical sequelae (often called Long Covid) may persist after acute Covid-19, their nature, frequency, and aetiology are poorly characterised. This study aims to regularly synthesise evidence on Long Covid characteristics, to inform clinical management, rehabilitation, and interventional studies to improve long term outcomes. MethodsA living systematic review. Medline, CINAHL (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), WHO Global Research Database on Covid-19, LitCOVID, and Google Scholar were searched up to 17th March 2021. Published studies including at least 100 people with confirmed or clinically suspected Covid-19 at 12 weeks or more post-onset were included. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and meta-analyses to estimate prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThirty-nine studies were included 32 cohort, six cross-sectional, and one case-control. Most showed high or moderate risk of bias. None were set in low-income countries, limited studies included children. Studies reported on 10,951 people (48% female) in 12 countries. Most followed-up post hospital discharge (78%, 8520/10951). The longest mean follow-up was 221.7 (SD 10.9) days post Covid-19 onset. An extensive range of symptoms with wide prevalence was reported, most commonly weakness (41%; 95% CI 25% to 59%), malaise (33%; 95% CI 15% to 57%), fatigue (31%; 95% CI 24% to 39%), concentration impairment (26%; 95% CI 21% to 32%), and breathlessness (25%; 95% CI 18% to 34%). Other frequent symptoms included musculoskeletal, neurological, and psychological. 37% (95% CI 18% to 60%) of people reported reduced quality of life. ConclusionLong Covid is a complex condition with heterogeneous symptoms. The nature of the studies precludes a precise case definition or evaluation of risk factors. There is an urgent need for prospective, robust, standardised controlled studies into aetiology, risk factors, and biomarkers to characterise Long Covid in different at-risk populations and settings. Systematic review registrationThe protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020211131). Section 1 What is already known?O_LIA significant number of people continue to describe ongoing symptoms long after the acute phase of Covid-19, often referred to as Long Covid. C_LIO_LILong Covid is a heterogeneous condition with an uncertain prevalence, for which there is currently no precise case definition. C_LI Section 2 What are the new findings?O_LIThis living systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of peer-reviewed published evidence on persistent symptoms of Covid-19 and will be regularly updated as new evidence emerges. C_LIO_LIThe breadth of reported symptoms suggests a complex, heterogeneous condition affecting both those who were hospitalised and those managed in the community. C_LIO_LIOur review identifies weakness (41%; 95% CI 25% to 59%), general malaise (33%; 95% confidence interval 15% to 57%), fatigue (31%; 95% CI 24% to 39%), concentration impairment (26%; 95% CI 21% to 32%) and breathlessness (25%; 95% CI 18% to 34%) as the most common symptoms. C_LI Section 3 What do the new findings imply?O_LIThe current evidence base of the clinical spectrum of Long Covid is limited, based on heterogenous data, and vulnerable to biases, hence caution should be used when interpreting or generalising the results. C_LIO_LIOur review identifies areas where further Long Covid research is critically needed to help characterise Long Covid in different populations and define its aetiology, risk factors, and biomarkers, as well as the impact on variants of concern and vaccination on long term outcomes. C_LI
License
cc_by_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Etiology study / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct / Review / Systematic review Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Etiology study / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct / Review / Systematic review Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...