Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mathematical modelling projections versus the actual course of the COVID-19 epidemic following the nationwide lockdown in Kyrgyzstan
Ainura Moldokmatova; Aida Estebesova; Aizhan Dooronbekova; Chynar Zhumalieva; Aibek Mukambetov; Talant Abdyldaev; Aisuluu Kubatova; Shamil Ibragimov; Nurbolot Usenbaev; Ainura Kutmanova; Lisa J White.
Affiliation
  • Ainura Moldokmatova; Univeristy of Oxford
  • Aida Estebesova; USAID Mission in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Aizhan Dooronbekova; Public Fund Institution of Social Development in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Chynar Zhumalieva; Public Fund Institution of Social Development in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Aibek Mukambetov; Soros Foundation in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Talant Abdyldaev; Kyrgyz Medical Academy in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Aisuluu Kubatova; Public Fund Institution of Social Development in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Shamil Ibragimov; Soros Foundation in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Nurbolot Usenbaev; Ministry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Ainura Kutmanova; Ministry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Lisa J White; University of Oxford
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20247247
ABSTRACT
Kyrgyzstan was placed under a two-month, nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 epidemic, starting on March 25, 2020. Given the highly disruptive effects of the lockdown on the national economy and peoples lives, the government decided not to extend lockdown beyond the initially planned date of May 10, 2020. The strategy chosen by the government was close to the input parameters of our models baseline scenario, full lockdown release, which we presented to policymakers in April 2020, along with various other hypothetical scenarios with managed lockdown release options. To explore whether our model could accurately predict the actual course of the epidemic following the release of lockdown, we compared the outputs of the baseline scenario, such as new cases, deaths, and demand for and occupancy of hospital beds, with actual official reports. Our analysis revealed that the model could accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak, with a difference of just two weeks, although the magnitude of the peak was overestimated compared with the official statistics. However, it is important to note that the accuracy of the official reports remains debatable, so outputs relating to the size of the epidemic and related pressures on the health system will need to be updated if new evidence becomes available.
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document type: Preprint
...