Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antibody response to first and second dose of BNT162b2 in a cohort of characterized healthcare workers
Andrea Padoan; Luigi Dall'Olmo; Foscarina Della Rocca; Francesco Barbaro; Chiara Cosma; Daniela Basso; Annamaria Cattelan; Vito Cianci; Mario Plebani.
Affiliation
  • Andrea Padoan; university of padova
  • Luigi Dall'Olmo; Padua University Hospital
  • Foscarina Della Rocca; University hospital of padova
  • Francesco Barbaro; University hospital of padova
  • Chiara Cosma; University hospital of padova
  • Daniela Basso; University of Padova
  • Annamaria Cattelan; University hospital of padova
  • Vito Cianci; University hospital of padova
  • Mario Plebani; University of Padova
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254240
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
BackgroundVaccine-induced population immunity is a key global strategy to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rapid implementation and availability of several COVID-19 vaccines is now a global health-care priority but more information about humoral responses to single- and double-dose vaccine is needed Methods163 health care workers (HCW) of the Padua University Hospitals, who underwent a complete vaccination campaign with BNT162b2 vaccine were asked to collect serum samples at 12 (t12) and 28 (t28) days after the first inoculum to allow the measurement of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies (Ab) using chemiluminescent assays against the spike (S) protein and the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the virus, respectively. ResultsSignificant differences were found at t12 for infection-naive and subjects with previous-natural infection who present higher values of specific antibodies, while no significant differences have been found between t12 and t28. No statistically significant difference was found between male and female, while lower Ab levels have been observed in subjects older than 60 years at t12 but not at t28. ConclusionsOur study confirms observed differences in vaccine responses between infection-naive and subjects with previous natural infection at t12 but not for a longer time. The influence of sex and age deserves further studies, even if the relationship with age seems particularly significant.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...