Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective analytical performance evaluation of the QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag for asymptomatic individuals
Yoshihiko Kiyasu; Yuto Takeuchi; Yusaku Akashi; Daisuke Kato; Miwa Kuwahara; Shino Muramatsu; Shigeyuki Notake; Atsuo Ueda; Koji Nakamura; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hiromichi Suzuki.
Affiliation
  • Yoshihiko Kiyasu; University of Tsukuba Hospital
  • Yuto Takeuchi; University of Tsukuba Hospital
  • Yusaku Akashi; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
  • Daisuke Kato; Denka Co., Ltd
  • Miwa Kuwahara; Denka Co., Ltd
  • Shino Muramatsu; Denka Co., Ltd.
  • Shigeyuki Notake; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
  • Atsuo Ueda; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
  • Koji Nakamura; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
  • Hiroichi Ishikawa; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
  • Hiromichi Suzuki; University of Tsukuba Hospital
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254813
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
IntroductionAntigen testing may help screen for and detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in asymptomatic individuals. However, limited data regarding the diagnostic performance of antigen tests for this group are available. MethodsWe used clinical samples to prospectively evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the antigen test QuickNavi-COVID19 Ag. This study was conducted at a PCR center between October 7, 2020 and January 9, 2021. Two nasopharyngeal samples per patient were obtained with flocked swabs; one was used for the antigen test, and the other for real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, and the RT-PCR results were used as a reference. ResultsAmong the 1,934 collected samples, SARS-CoV-2 was detected by real-time RT-PCR in 188 (9.7%); 76 (40.4%) of these samples were from asymptomatic individuals. Over half of the total samples (1,073; 55.5%) were obtained from asymptomatic volunteers. The sensitivity of the antigen test was significantly lower for asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients (67.1% vs 89.3%, p < 0.001). The specificity was 100% for both groups, and no false positives were observed among all 1,934 samples. The median Ct value for the asymptomatic group was significantly higher than that of the symptomatic group (24 vs 20, p < 0.001). ConclusionsThe QuickNavi-COVID19 Ag showed a lower sensitivity for asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients. However, its specificity was consistently high, and no false positives were found in this study.
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...