Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study
Matt Hitchings; Otavio T. Ranzani; Mario S.S. Torres; Silvano Barbosa de Oliveira; Maria Almiron; Rodrigo Said; Ryan Borg; Wade L. Schulz; Roberto Dias de Oliveira; Patricia Vieira da Silva; Daniel Barros de Castro; Vanderson de Souza Sampaio; Bernardino Cláudio de Albuquerque; Tatyana Costa Amorim Ramos; Shadia Hussami Hauache Fraxe; Cristiano Fernandes da Costa; Felipe Gomes Naveca; André M. Siqueira; Wildo Navegantes de Araújo; Jason R. Andrews; Derek A.T. Cummings; Albert I. Ko; Julio Croda.
Affiliation
  • Matt Hitchings; Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • Otavio T. Ranzani; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Barcelona Institute for Global Health, ISGlobal
  • Mario S.S. Torres; Municipal Health Secretary of Manaus
  • Silvano Barbosa de Oliveira; Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil;Pan American Health Organization
  • Maria Almiron; Pan American Health Organization
  • Rodrigo Said; Pan American Health Organization
  • Ryan Borg; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Wade L. Schulz; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine,
  • Roberto Dias de Oliveira; State University of Mato Grosso do Sul - UEMS, Dourados, MS, Brazil
  • Patricia Vieira da Silva; Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
  • Daniel Barros de Castro; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas
  • Vanderson de Souza Sampaio; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas
  • Bernardino Cláudio de Albuquerque; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas
  • Tatyana Costa Amorim Ramos; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas
  • Shadia Hussami Hauache Fraxe; Municipal Health Secretary of Manaus
  • Cristiano Fernandes da Costa; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Estado do Amazonas
  • Felipe Gomes Naveca; Fiocruz, Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane
  • André M. Siqueira; Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Carlos Chagas-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Wildo Navegantes de Araújo; Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil;National Institute for Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil;Pan Amer
  • Jason R. Andrews; Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Derek A.T. Cummings; Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • Albert I. Ko; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA;Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA,
  • Julio Croda; Fiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil;Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil;Departme
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21255081
ABSTRACT
BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant, Gamma, emerged in the city of Manaus in late 2020 during a large resurgence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and has spread throughout Brazil. The effectiveness of vaccines in settings with widespread Gamma variant transmission has not been reported. MethodsWe performed a matched test-negative case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated vaccine, CoronaVac, in healthcare workers (HCWs) in Manaus, where the Gamma variant accounted for 86% of genotyped SARS-CoV-2 samples at the peak of its epidemic. We performed an early analysis of effectiveness following administration of at least one vaccine dose and an analysis of effectiveness of the two-dose schedule. The primary outcome was symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. FindingsFor the early at-least-one-dose and two-dose analyses the study population was, respectively, 53,176 and 53,153 HCWs residing in Manaus and aged 18 years or older, with complete information on age, residence, and vaccination status. Among 53,153 HCWs eligible for the two-dose analysis, 47,170 (89%) received at least one dose of CoronaVac and 2,656 individuals (5%) underwent RT-PCR testing from 19 January, 2021 to 13 April, 2021. Of 3,195 RT-PCR tests, 885 (28%) were positive. 393 and 418 case- control pairs were selected for the early and two-dose analyses, respectively, matched on calendar time, age, and neighbourhood. Among those who had received both vaccine doses before the RT-PCR sample collection date, the average time from second dose to sample collection date was 14 days (IQR 7-24). In the early analysis, vaccination with at least one dose was associated with a 0.50-fold reduction (adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE), 49.6%, 95% CI 11.3 to 71.4) in the odds of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the first dose. However, we estimated low effectiveness (adjusted VE 36.8%, 95% CI -54.9 to 74.2) of the two-dose schedule against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the second dose. A finding that vaccinated individuals were much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated individuals in the period 0-13 days after first dose (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.36-3.27) suggests that unmeasured confounding led to downward bias in the vaccine effectiveness estimate. InterpretationEvidence from this test-negative study of the effectiveness of CoronaVac was mixed, and likely affected by bias in this setting. Administration of at least one vaccine dose showed effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the setting of epidemic Gamma variant transmission. However, the low estimated effectiveness of the two-dose schedule underscores the need to maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions while vaccination campaigns with CoronaVac are being implemented. FundingFundacao Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz); Municipal Health Secretary of Manaus Research in ContextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed for articles published from inception of the pandemic until April 3, 2021, with no language restrictions, using the search terms "P.1" AND "vaccine" AND "SARS-CoV-2". Additionally, we searched for "CoronaVac" AND "SARS-CoV-2". Early studies have found plasma from convalescent COVID-19 patients and sera from vaccinated individuals have reduced neutralisation of the SARS-CoV-2 variant, Gamma or P.1, compared with strains isolated earlier in the pandemic. Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA, Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1, and CoronaVac are the only vaccines for which such data has been published to date. No studies reported effectiveness of any vaccine on reducing the risk of infection or disease among individuals exposed to P.1 or in settings of high P.1 transmission. Added value of this studyThis study finds that vaccination with CoronaVac was 49.4% (95% CI 13.2 to 71.9) effective at preventing COVID-19 in a setting with likely high prevalence of the Gamma Variant of Concern. However, an analysis of effectiveness by dose was underpowered and failed to find significant effectiveness of the two-dose schedule of CoronaVac (estimated VE 37.1%, 95% CI -53.3 to 74.2). Implications of all the available evidenceThese findings are suggestive for the effectiveness of CoronaVac in healthcare workers in the setting of widespread P.1 transmission but must be strengthened by observational studies in other settings and populations. Based on this evidence, there is a need to implement sustained non-pharmaceutical interventions even as vaccination campaigns continue.
License
cc_by_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Review Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Review Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...