Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of in-hospital use of ACE-I/ARB and COVID-19 outcomes in African American population
Shilong Li; Rangaprasad Sarangarajan; Tomi Jun; Yu-Han Kao; Zichen Wang; Emilio Schadt; Michael A. Kiebish; Elder Granger; Niven R. Narain; Rong Chen; Eric E. Schadt; Li Li.
Affiliation
  • Shilong Li; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Rangaprasad Sarangarajan; BERG, 500 Old Connecticut Path, Bldg B 3rd Floor, Framingham, MA, USA.
  • Tomi Jun; Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Yu-Han Kao; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Zichen Wang; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Emilio Schadt; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Michael A. Kiebish; BERG, 500 Old Connecticut Path, Bldg B 3rd Floor, Framingham, MA, USA.
  • Elder Granger; BERG, 500 Old Connecticut Path, Bldg B 3rd Floor, Framingham, MA, USA.
  • Niven R. Narain; BERG, 500 Old Connecticut Path, Bldg B 3rd Floor, Framingham, MA, USA.
  • Rong Chen; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Eric E. Schadt; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
  • Li Li; Sema4, Stamford, CT, USA
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21255443
ABSTRACT
ImportanceThe ACE D allele is more prevalent among African Americans (AA) compared to other races/ethnicities and has previously been associated with severe COVID-19 pathogenesis through excessive ACE1 activity. ACE-I/ARBs may counteract this mechanism, but their association with COVID-19 outcomes has not been specifically tested in the AA population. ObjectivesTo determine whether the use of ACE-I/ARBs is associated with COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in AA compared with non-AA population. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this observational, retrospective study, patient-level data were extracted from the Mount Sinai Health Systems (MSHS) electronic medical record (EMR) database, and 6,218 patients with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from February 24 to May 31, 2020 were identified as ACE-I/ARB users. ExposuresPatients with an active prescription from January 1, 2019 up to the date of admission for ACE-I/ARB (outpatient use) and patients administered ACE-I/ARB during hospitalization (in-hospital use) were identified. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, assessed in the entire, AA, and non-AA population. ResultsOf the 6,218 COVID-19 patients, 1,138 (18.3%) were ACE-I/ARB users. In a multivariate logistic regression model, ACE-I/ARB use was independently associated with reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in the entire population (OR, 0.655; 95% CI, 0.505-0.850; P=0.001), AA population (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.249-0.779; P=0.005), and non-AA population (OR, 0.748, 95% CI, 0.553-1.012, P=0.06). In the AA population, in-hospital use of ACE-I/ARBs was associated with improved mortality (OR, 0.378; 95% CI, 0.188-0.766; P=0.006) while outpatient use was not (OR, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.375-2.158; P=0.812). When analyzing each medication class separately, ARB in-hospital use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in the AA population (OR, 0.196; 95% CI, 0.074-0.516; P=0.001), while ACE-I use was not associated with impact on mortality in any population. Conclusion and RelevanceIn-hospital use of ARBs was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality among COVID-19-positive AA patients. These results support further investigation of ARBs to improve outcomes in AA patients at high risk for COVID-19-related mortality.
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...