Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infection control, occupational and public health measures including mRNA-based vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infections to protect healthcare workers from variants of concern: a 14-month observational study using surveillance data
Annalee Yassi; Jennifer M. Grant; Karen Lockhart; Stephen Barker; Stacy Sprague; Arnold I. Okpani; Titus Wong; Patricia Daly; William Henderson; Stan Lubin; Chad Kim Sing.
Affiliation
  • Annalee Yassi; The University of British Columbia
  • Jennifer M. Grant; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • Karen Lockhart; The University of British Columbia
  • Stephen Barker; The University of British Columbia
  • Stacy Sprague; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • Arnold I. Okpani; The University of British Columbia
  • Titus Wong; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • Patricia Daly; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • William Henderson; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • Stan Lubin; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
  • Chad Kim Sing; Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21257600
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
BackgroundWe evaluated measures to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) in Vancouver, Canada, where variants of concern (VOC) went from <1% in February 2021 to >92% in mid-May. Canada has amongst the longest periods between vaccine doses worldwide, despite Vancouver having the highest P.1 variant rate outside Brazil. MethodsWith surveillance data since the pandemic began, we tracked laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, positivity rates, and vaccine uptake in all 25,558 HCWs in Vancouver Coastal Health, by occupation and subsector, and compared to the general population. We employed Cox regression modelling adjusted for age and calendar-time to calculate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 in fully vaccinated ([≥] 7 days post-second dose), partially vaccinated (14 days post vaccine) and unvaccinated HCWs; we also compared with unvaccinated community members of the same age-range. FindingsOnly 3.3% of our HCWs became infected, mirroring community rates, with peak positivity of 9.1%, compared to 11.8% in the community. As vaccine coverage increased, SARS-CoV-2 infections declined significantly in HCWs, despite a surge with predominantly VOC; unvaccinated HCWs had an infection rate of 1.3/10,000 person-days compared to 0.89 for HCWs post first dose, and 0.30 for fully vaccinated HCWs. VE compared to unvaccinated HCWs was 37.2% (95% CI 16.6-52.7%) 14 days post-first dose, 79.2% (CI 64.6-87.8%) 7 days post-second dose; one dose provided significant protection against infection until at least day 42. Compared with community infection rates, VE after one dose was 54.7% (CI 44.8-62.9%); and 84.8% (CI 75.2-90.7%) when fully vaccinated. InterpretationPredominantly droplet-contact precautions, with N95s required for aerosol generating medical procedures and available as needed according to point-of-care risk assessment, has been a highly effective approach to preventing occupational infection in HCWs, with one dose of mRNA vaccination further reducing infection risk despite VOC and transmissibility concerns. Delaying second doses to allow more widespread vaccination against severe disease, with strict public health, occupational health and infection control measures, has been effective in protecting the healthcare workforce.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...