Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Generation of false positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen results with testing conditions outside manufacturer recommendations: A scientific approach to pandemic misinformation
Glenn Patriquin; Ross Davidson; Todd F Hatchette; Breanne M Head; Edgard Mejia; Michael G. Becker; Adrienne F.A. Meyers; Paul A. Sandstrom; Jacob Hatchette; Ava Block; Nicole Smith; John Ross; Jason J LeBlanc.
Affiliation
  • Glenn Patriquin; Nova Scotia Health
  • Ross Davidson; Queen Elizabeth II HSC
  • Todd F Hatchette; Nova Scotia Health Authority
  • Breanne M Head; National Microbiology Laboratory (NML), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
  • Edgard Mejia; National Microbiology Laboratory (NML), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
  • Michael G. Becker; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Adrienne F.A. Meyers; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Paul A. Sandstrom; Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Jacob Hatchette; Praxes Medical Group
  • Ava Block; Praxes Medical Group
  • Nicole Smith; Praxes Medical Group
  • John Ross; Praxes Medical Group
  • Jason J LeBlanc; Nova Scotia Health
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21259490
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesAntigen-based rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs) are useful tools for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, misleading demonstrations of the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag-RDT on social media claimed that SARS-CoV-2 antigen could be detected in municipal water and food products. To offer a scientific rebuttal to pandemic misinformation and disinformation, this study explored the impact of using the Panbio SARS-CoV-2 assay with conditions falling outside of manufacturer recommendations. MethodsUsing Panbio, various water and food products, laboratory buffers, and SARS-CoV-2-negative clinical specimens were tested, with and without manufacturer buffer. Additional experiments were conducted to assess the role of each Panbio buffer component (tricine, NaCl, pH, and tween-20), as well as the impact of temperatures (4{degrees}C, 20{degrees}C, and 45{degrees}C) and humidity (90%) on assay performance. ResultsDirect sample testing (without the kit buffer), resulted in false positive signals resembling those obtained with SARS-CoV-2-positive controls tested under proper conditions. The likely explanation of these artifacts is non-specific interactions between the SARS-CoV-2-specific conjugated and capture antibodies, as proteinase K treatment abrogated this phenomenon, and thermal shift assays showed pH-induced conformational changes under conditions promoting artifact formation. Omitting, altering, and reverse engineering the kit buffer all supported the importance of maintaining buffering capacity, ionic strength, and pH for accurate kit function. Interestingly, the Panbio assay could tolerate some extremes of temperature and humidity outside of manufacturer claims. ConclusionsOur data support strict adherence to manufacturer instructions to avoid false positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT reactions, otherwise resulting in anxiety, overuse of public health resources, and dissemination of misinformation.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...