Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 management in social care in England: a systematic review of changing policies and newspaper reported staff perspectives.
Lavinia Bertini; Leanne Bogen-Johnston; Jo Middleton; Wendy Wood; Shanu Sadhwani; Julien Forder; Daniel Roland; Rebecca Sharp; John Drury; Jackie A Cassell.
Affiliation
  • Lavinia Bertini; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
  • Leanne Bogen-Johnston; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
  • Jo Middleton; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
  • Wendy Wood; School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, UK.
  • Shanu Sadhwani; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
  • Julien Forder; Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
  • Daniel Roland; Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
  • Rebecca Sharp; Kent Surrey Sussex Academic Health Science Network, Worthing, West Sussex, UK.
  • John Drury; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
  • Jackie A Cassell; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21266410
ABSTRACT
Adult social care has been a major focus of public attention and infection control guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a high mortality both for carers and those receiving care. To protect themselves and others from infection, staff in residential and domiciliary care settings had to quickly adapt to infection control measures that heavily impacted on their working and every-day life, whilst navigating new responsibilities, uncertainties and anxieties. We sought to explore the production and reception of guidance and look at ways these can be adapted to improve the working life of care staff in domiciliary and residential care whilst reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission amid this pandemic and of future emerging infections. We conducted two complementary and integrated systematic reviews of published documents in the pre-vaccination era (1) National guidance for social care (conducted between 29 July to 28 October 2020), and (2) Newspaper coverage of infection control issues in social care (conducted between 27th July to 10th September 2020). Three higher order common themes emerged in the integrated systematic review of guidance documents and newspaper articles a) Testing, b) Personal Protective Equipment, c) Employment. The reviews revealed a sharp disjunction between the content of infection control guidance and its usability and applicability in social care settings. We suggest that infection control guidance needs to be better adapted to social care settings and informed by the sector. The practicalities of care work and care settings need to be at the core of the process for guidance to be relevant and effective. Modes and timings of communications also need to be optimised.
License
cc_no
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study / Review / Systematic review Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Prognostic study / Review / Systematic review Language: English Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...