This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
The Effects of Messaging on Expectations and Understanding of Long COVID: An Online Randomised Trial
Preprint
in English
| medRxiv
| ID: ppmedrxiv-22269467
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesWe examined whether providing different types of information about Long COVID would affect expectations about the illness. DesignA 2 (Illness description Long COVID vs ongoing COVID-19 recovery) x 2 (Illness uncertainty uncertainty emphasised vs uncertainty not emphasised) x 2 (Efficacy of support enhanced support vs basic support) between-subjects randomised online experimental study. SettingThe online platform Prolific, collected in October 2021. ParticipantsA representative sample of 1110 members of the public in the UK. InterventionsParticipants were presented with a scenario describing a positive COVID-19 test result and then presented with one of eight scenarios describing a Long COVID diagnosis. Primary and Secondary Outcome MeasuresVarious outcome measures relating to illness expectations were captured including symptom severity, symptom duration, quality of life, personal control, treatment control and illness coherence. ResultsWe ran a series of 2 x 2 x 2 ANOVAs on the outcome variables. We found a main effect of illness description individuals reported longer symptom duration and less illness coherence when the illness was described as Long COVID (compared to ongoing COVID-19 recovery). There was a main effect of illness uncertainty when uncertainty was emphasised, participants reported longer expected symptom duration, less treatment control, and less illness coherence than when uncertainty was not emphasised. There was also a main effect of efficacy of support participants reported higher personal control and higher treatment control when support was enhanced (compared to basic support). We also found an interaction between illness description and efficacy of support when support was enhanced, participants reported less illness coherence for Long COVID (compared to ongoing COVID-19 recovery). ConclusionsCommunications around Long COVID should not emphasise symptom uncertainty and should provide people with information on how they can facilitate their recovery and where they can access additional support. The findings also suggest that use of the term ongoing COVID-19 recovery, where possible, may reduce negative expectations associated with the illness. Strengths and Limitations of this studyO_LIThis is one of the first experimental designed studies to assess the impact of different types of communication about Long COVID. C_LIO_LIParticipants were a UK representative sample, although these findings are not necessarily applicable to all population groups (i.e., ethnic minorities). C_LIO_LIThis study is one of the first applications of the IPQ-R in a hypothetical, online experiment, with high reliability. C_LIO_LIThis was an online experiment, with hypothetical scenarios and participants with no experience of COVID-19 or Long COVID, therefore outcomes may be different in a real-world context. C_LI
cc_by
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
medRxiv
Type of study:
Experimental_studies
/
Prognostic study
/
Rct
Language:
English
Year:
2022
Document type:
Preprint