Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of machine learning for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from a national electronic medical records database
Scott Lee; Sean Browning; Ermias Belay; Jennifer DeCuir; Shana Godfred Cato; Pragna Patel; Noah Schwartz; Karen Wong.
Affiliation
  • Scott Lee; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Sean Browning; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Ermias Belay; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Jennifer DeCuir; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Shana Godfred Cato; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Pragna Patel; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Noah Schwartz; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Karen Wong; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Preprint in En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22273835
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveWhen novel diseases such as COVID-19 emerge, predictors of clinical outcomes might be unknown. Using data from electronic medical records (EMR) allows evaluation of potential predictors without selecting specific features a priori for a model. We evaluated different machine learning models for predicting outcomes among COVID-19 inpatients using raw EMR data. Materials and MethodsIn Premier Healthcare Data Special Release COVID-19 Edition (PHD-SR COVID-19, release date March, 24 2021), we included patients admitted with COVID-19 during February 2020 through April 2021 and built time-ordered medical histories. Setting the prediction horizon at 24 hours into the first COVID-19 inpatient visit, we aimed to predict intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hyperinflammatory syndrome (HS), and death. We evaluated the following models L2-penalized logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting classifier, deep averaging network, and recurrent neural network with a long short-term memory cell. ResultsThere were 57,355 COVID-19 patients identified in PHD-SR COVID-19. ICU admission was the easiest outcome to predict (best AUC=79%), and HS was the hardest to predict (best AUC=70%). Models performed similarly within each outcome. DiscussionAlthough the models learned to attend to meaningful clinical information, they performed similarly, suggesting performance limitations are inherent to the data. ConclusionPredictive models using raw EMR data are promising because they can use many observations and encompass a large feature space; however, traditional and deep learning models may perform similarly when few features are available at the individual patient level.
License
cc0
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint