Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study
Danielle Lamb; Rafael Gafoor; Hannah Scott; Ewan Carr; Sharon Stevelink; Rosalind Raine; Matthew Hotopf; Neil Greenberg; Siobhan Hegarty; Ira Madan; Paul Moran; Richard Morriss; Dominic Murphy; Anne Marie Rafferty; Scott Weich; Sarah Dorrington; Simon Wessely.
Affiliation
  • Danielle Lamb; UCL
  • Rafael Gafoor; University College London
  • Hannah Scott; King's College London
  • Ewan Carr; King's College London
  • Sharon Stevelink; King's College London
  • Rosalind Raine; University College London
  • Matthew Hotopf; King's College London
  • Neil Greenberg; King's College London
  • Siobhan Hegarty; King's College London
  • Ira Madan; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Paul Moran; University of Bristol
  • Richard Morriss; University of Nottingham
  • Dominic Murphy; Combat Stress
  • Anne Marie Rafferty; King's College London
  • Scott Weich; University of Sheffield
  • Sarah Dorrington; King's College London
  • Simon Wessely; King's College London
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22276479
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo examine variations in impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of all types of healthcare workers (HCWs) in England over the first 17 months of the pandemic. MethodWe undertook a prospective cohort study of 22,501 HCWs from 18 English acute and mental health NHS Trusts, collecting online survey data on common mental disorders (CMDs), depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and PTSD, from April 2020 to August 2021. We analysed these data cross-sectionally by time period (corresponding to periods the NHS was under most pressure), and longitudinally. Data were weighted to better represent Trust population demographics. ResultsThe proportion of those with probable CMDs was greater during periods when the NHS was under most pressure (measured by average monthly deaths). For example, 55% (95%CI 53%, 58%) of participants reported symptoms of CMDs in April-June 2020 versus 47% (95%CI 46%, 48%) July-October 2020. Contrary to expectation, there were no major differences between professional groups (i.e. clinical and non-clinical staff). Younger, female, lower paid staff, who felt poorly supported by colleagues/managers, and who experienced potentially morally injurious events were most at risk of negative mental health outcomes. ConclusionAmong HCWs, the prevalence of probable CMDs increased during periods of escalating pressure on the NHS, suggesting staff support should be increased at such points in the future, and staff should be better prepared for such situations via training. All staff, regardless of role, experienced poorer mental health during these periods, suggesting that support should be provided for all staff groups. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSExisting evidence about the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) through the COVID-19 pandemic comes mainly from cross-sectional studies using unrepresentative convenience samples, typically focussing on clinical staff rather than all HCWs. Such studies show high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders, but the strength of this evidence is uncertain. What this study addsUsing a defined sampling frame, with longitudinal, weighted data, we show that during periods of greater pressure on the NHS (as indicated by average monthly national COVID-19 death rates), prevalence of mental disorder symptoms increased, and, importantly, that this effect was seen in non-clinical as well as clinical staff. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThese findings indicate that provision of support for HCWs should not only focus on those providing clinical care, but also on non-clinical staff such as porters, cleaners, and administrative staff, and additional support should be provided during higher pressure periods. Better preparation of staff for such situations is also suggested.
License
cc_by_nc
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint
Full text: Available Collection: Preprints Database: medRxiv Type of study: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Rct Language: English Year: 2022 Document type: Preprint
...