This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Trends in scientific publishing and good practices in research: what do nurse-researcher know? / Boas práticas em pesquisa e editoração científica: o que conhecem os pesquisadores-enfermeiros do Brasil?
Preprint
in English
| SciELO Preprints
| ID: pps-1781
Responsible library:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Objective:
to verify the knowledge of nurse-researchers on trends in scientific publishing and good research practices, as well as to compare the results according to the degree of training.Method:
descriptive study conducted through an online survey with 197 nurses with master's and/or doctorate degrees from all Brazilian regions. To raise knowledge, a validated, self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was used. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed on the researchers' score (Mann-Whitney test).Results:
Among the 18 specific questions, the average of correct answers was 7.1; being 6.4 for masters and 7.4 for doctors. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of correct answers between masters and doctors (p=0.025), and between productivity scholarship holders and non-scholarship holders (p=0.021), according to means difference tests. Questions about predatory editorial practices were those in which researchers performed worse.Conclusion:
We identified a low level of knowledge among the participants, regardless of their level of education (master's or doctorate). The expansion of dissemination and articulation strategies for this knowledge is necessary for the production of quality scientific knowledge in the area.RESUMO
Objetivo:
verificar o conhecimento de enfermeiros-pesquisadores em temas relacionados a boas práticas em pesquisa e editoração científica e comparar os resultados de acordo com o grau de formação.Método:
estudo descritivo realizado por inquérito on-line com 197 enfermeiros mestres ou doutores de todas as regiões brasileiras. Para levantar o conhecimento utilizou-se um questionário validado, autoaplicável e anônimo. Sobre o escore dos pesquisadores realizaram-se análises descritivas e inferenciais (Teste de Mann-Whitney).Resultados:
Entre as 18 questões específicas, a média de acertos foi de 7,1; sendo de 6,4 para mestres e 7,4 para doutores. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na média de acertos entre mestres e doutores (p=0,025), e entre bolsistas e não-bolsistas de produtividade (p=0,021), segundo testes de diferença de médias. As questões sobre práticas editoriais predatórias foram aquelas em que os pesquisadores apresentaram os piores escores.Conclusão:
Identificamos baixo conhecimento dos participantes independente do grau de formação (mestrado ou doutorado). A ampliação das estratégias de divulgação e articulação desse conhecimento são necessárias para a produção de conhecimento científico de qualidade na área.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Health context:
Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas
Health problem:
Goal 3 Human resources for health
Database:
SciELO Preprints
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Country/Region as subject:
South America
/
Brazil
Language:
English
Year:
2021
Document type:
Preprint