US-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage: Comparative Study of Right-sided and Left-sided Approach
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
; : 115-118, 2002.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM (Western Pacific)
| ID: wpr-16357
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the feasibility and safety of US-guided right and left percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Between March 1998 and May 1999, 32 patients underwent 36 US-guided right or left PTBD in referred order, alternatively. The causes of biliary obstruction were bile duct stone (n=2), bile duct carcinoma (n=10), carcinoma of the pancreas (n=9), GB carcinoma (n=7), metastasis to the porta hepatis (n=3), and carcinoma of the ampulla of vater (n=1). Technical success, procedure time, fluoroscopic time, and complications were evaluated.RESULTS:
PTBD was successful in 94% of both right and left approach. The average procedure time was 9.7+/-3.8 min. in the right approach and 9.6+/-3.1 min. in the left approach, respectively (p=0.794). The average fluoroscopic time were 3.9+/-2.4 min. in the right approach and 3.8+/-2.2 min. in the left approach (p=0.892). A major complication, bile peritonitis, occurred in one of 16 patient with right-sided approach. Minor complications occurred in six right (2 hemobilia, 3 tube malfunction, 1 cholangitis) and three left (1 hemobilia, 1 fever, 1 cholangitis) PTBD. There were no significant difference in the complication rates between right and left PTBD (p=0.729).CONCLUSION:
There were no significant differences in feasibility and safety in US-guided right and left PTBD.
Full text:
Available
Database:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Pancreas
/
Peritonitis
/
Ampulla of Vater
/
Bile
/
Bile Ducts
/
Drainage
/
Fever
/
Hemobilia
/
Neoplasm Metastasis
Limits:
Humans
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
Year:
2002
Document type:
Article