Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Efficacy between MonoPrep(R) and Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening / 대한산부인과학회잡지
Article in Ko | WPRIM | ID: wpr-182595
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the specimen adequacy and cytologic diagnostic results of MonoPrep(R), a type of liquid based preparation, with the conventional Pap smear. METHODS: In randomly selected 156 patients who visited the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University Hospital for cervical biopsy, conventional Pap smear and matched MonoPrep(R) were performed. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square test. RESULTS: There were more "Unsatisfactory" and "Satisfactory but limited by (SBLB)" results in the conventional Pap smear group, even though no statistical significance could be found between the two groups. ASC/LSIL ratio was significantly decreased in the MonoPrep(R) group, showing 0.4 with MonoPrep(R) and 1.9 with conventional Pap smear demonstrating a 78.4% decrease (P<0.001). In detecting abnormal cervical lesions, conventional pap smear showed a sensitivity of 87.7%, positive predictability of 82.3%, false negativity of 10.3%, while MonoPrep(R) showed a sensitivity of 94.8% (P=0.04), positive predictability of 97.4% (P<0.001), and false negativity of 2.6% (P=0.016). CONCLUSION: MonoPrep(R) is more effective for the detection of cervical lesions with higher sensitivity and lower false negativity compared to conventional pap smear.
Subject(s)
Key words
Full text: 1 Database: WPRIM Main subject: Biopsy / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Mass Screening / Papanicolaou Test / Gynecology / Obstetrics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: Ko Journal: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Year: 2004 Document type: Article
Full text: 1 Database: WPRIM Main subject: Biopsy / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Mass Screening / Papanicolaou Test / Gynecology / Obstetrics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: Ko Journal: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Year: 2004 Document type: Article