Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Staging of colorectal cancer using contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomographic colonography
Singapore medical journal ; : 660-666, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-244767
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Preoperative staging is essential for the optimal treatment and surgical planning of colorectal cancers. This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of colorectal cancer staging done using contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomographic colonography (CEMDCTC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We recruited 25 patients with 28 proven colorectal cancers. A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner was used to generate two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted sagittal, coronal and oblique coronal images, and three-dimensional virtual colonography (endoluminal) images. Axial and reformatted views were analysed, and TNM staging was done. Patients underwent surgery and conventional colonoscopy, and surgical histopathological correlation was obtained.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The diagnostic accuracies for TNM colorectal cancer staging were 92.3% for T staging, 42.3% for N staging and 96.1% for M staging using CEMDCTC. There was excellent positive correlation for T staging between CEMDCTC and both surgery (κ-value = 0.686) and histopathology (κ-value = 0.838) (p < 0.0001), and moderate positive correlation for N staging between CEMDCTC and surgery (κ-value = 0.424; p < 0.0001). The correlation between CEMDCTC and histopathology for N staging was poor (κ-value = 0.186; p < 0.05); the negative predictive value was 100% for lymph node detection. Moderate positive correlation was seen for M staging between CEMDCTC and both surgery (κ-value = 0.462) and histopathology (κ-value = 0.649). No false negatives were identified in any of the M0 cases.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>CEMDCTC correlated well with pathologic T and M stages, but poorly with pathologic N stage. It is an extremely accurate tool for T staging, but cannot reliably distinguish between malignant lymph nodes and enlarged reactive lymph nodes.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Pathology / Reference Standards / General Surgery / Colorectal Neoplasms / Prospective Studies / Reproducibility of Results / Contrast Media / Colonography, Computed Tomographic / Diagnosis / Multidetector Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Singapore medical journal Year: 2014 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Pathology / Reference Standards / General Surgery / Colorectal Neoplasms / Prospective Studies / Reproducibility of Results / Contrast Media / Colonography, Computed Tomographic / Diagnosis / Multidetector Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Singapore medical journal Year: 2014 Document type: Article
...