Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Downregulation of Na/CaExchanger Isoform 1 Protects Isolated Hearts by Sevoflurane Postconditioning but Not by Delayed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Rats / 中华医学杂志(英文版)
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 2226-2233, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-249010
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>

Background:

</b>Calcium regulatory proteins-L-type Cachannels (LTCCs), ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2), and Na/Caexchanger isoform 1 (NCX1) have been recognized as important protective mechanisms during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/RI). Both sevoflurane postconditioning (SevoPoC) and delayed remote ischemic preconditioning (DRIPC) have been shown to protect the heart against I/RI. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of SevoPoC and DRIPC on the expression of the three calcium regulatory proteins in an isolated rat heart model.</p><p><b>

Methods:

</b>After 30-min balanced perfusion, isolated hearts from rats were subjected to 30-min ischemia followed by 60-min reperfusion. Totally 40 isolated hearts were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10/group) time control group, I/RI group, SevoPoC group, and DRIPC group. The effect of SevoPoC (3% v/v) and DRIPC were observed. Myocardial infarct size (IS), cardiac troponin I level, and heart function were measured. The protein and messenger RNA levels of LTCCs, RyR2, and NCX1 were determined.</p><p><b>

Results:

</b>Both SevoPoC and DRIPC improved the recovery of myocardial function, and reduced cardiac troponin I release after I/RI. The decrease in IS was more significant in the SevoPoC group than that in the DRIPC group (16.50% ± 4.54% in the SevoPoC group [P = 0.0006], and 22.34% ± 4.02% in the DRIPC group [P = 0.0007] vs. 35.00% ± 5.24% in the I/RI group, respectively). SevoPoC, but not DRIPC significantly inhibited the activity of NCX1 (0.59 ± 0.09 in the I/RI group vs. 0.32 ± 0.16 in the SevoPoC group, P = 0.006; vs. 0.57 ± 0.14 in the DRIPC group, P = 0.072). No statistical significant differences were observed in the expression of LTCCs and RyR2 between SevoPoC and DRIPC. In addition, subsequent correlation analysis showed a significantly positive relationship between the cardiac troponin I level and the protein expression of NCX1 (r = 0.505, P = 0.023).</p><p><b>

Conclusion:

</b>SevoPoC may be more effective in the cardioprotection than DRIPC partly due to the deactivation of NCX1.</p>
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: English Journal: Chinese Medical Journal Year: 2017 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: English Journal: Chinese Medical Journal Year: 2017 Document type: Article
...