Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of cost-effectiveness between Urimem and direct freezing for urinary protein preservation / 生物工程学报
Chinese Journal of Biotechnology ; (12): 1128-1133, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-279441
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
To compare two enrichment and preservation methods of urinary proteins, stored in polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Urimem) or direct freezing, we examined the differences between the two methods in time, space, costs of supplies and electricity, degree of protein degradation and convenience of the sample handling. The urimem method is superior in the storage space, the cost of electricity and the clinical convenience compared to the direct freezing method. However, the direct freezing method is superior in the time and the cost of supplies to the urimem method. The enrichment and preservation of urinary proteins using urimem have more cost-effective benefits compared to those of the direct freezing method.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 4: Health financing Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Polyvinyls / Preservation, Biological / Urine / Proteins / Chemistry / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Freezing / Methods Type of study: Health economic evaluation Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Biotechnology Year: 2014 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 4: Health financing Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Polyvinyls / Preservation, Biological / Urine / Proteins / Chemistry / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Freezing / Methods Type of study: Health economic evaluation Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Biotechnology Year: 2014 Document type: Article
...