Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran / 한국의학교육
Korean Journal of Medical Education
; : 195-200, 2016.
Article
in English
| WPRIM (Western Pacific)
| ID: wpr-32286
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation.METHODS:
In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nursing BSc program in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools included demographic questionnaire and students' evaluation questionnaire, to evaluate "professional behavior" and "clinical skills" in pediatric ward. Every student got evaluated from clinical instructor, students, peers, clinical nurses, and children's mothers' point of view. Data analysis was done with descriptive and analytic statistics test including Pearson coefficient using SPSS version 18.0.RESULTS:
The evaluation mean scores were as following students, 89.74±6.17; peers, 94.12±6.87; children's mothers, 92.87±6.21; clinical instructor, 84.01±8.81; and the nurses, 94.87±6.35. The results showed a significant correlation between evaluation scores of peers, clinical instructor and self-evaluation (Pearson coefficient, p<0.001), but the correlation between the nurses' evaluation score and that of the clinical instructor was not significant (Pearson coefficient, p=0.052).CONCLUSION:
360 Degree evaluation can provide additional useful information on student performance and evaluation of different perspectives of care. The use of this method is recommended for clinical evaluation of nursing students.
Full text:
Available
Database:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Self-Assessment
/
Students, Nursing
/
Cross-Sectional Studies
/
Data Collection
/
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Statistics as Topic
/
Nursing
/
Clinical Competence
/
Censuses
/
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Observational study
/
Prevalence study
/
Risk factors
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
Asia
Language:
English
Journal:
Korean Journal of Medical Education
Year:
2016
Document type:
Article