Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Schemes for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections / 中国药房
China Pharmacy ; (12): 92-94, 2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-411528
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infections.

METHODS:

The cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infections was carried out.

RESULTS:

The cost-effectiveness ratio of penicillin-piperacillin schemes(L1)was minimum in respect to the effective rate.However,the cost-effectiveness ratios had no significant difference between cefotaxime scheme(L3)and L1 scheme in regard to cure rate(P>0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratio of ciprofloxacin-clinadmacin scheme(L2) was higher significantly than those of L1 and L3 schemes(P<0.05,both schemes).CONCLUSION: L1 is the best therapeutic scheme.Although L3 scheme had higher cost,it had higher cure rate and lower ADRs occurrence.L3 scheme is benefitial to improvement of patient's life quality.
Full text: Available Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 4: Health financing Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Health economic evaluation Language: Chinese Journal: China Pharmacy Year: 2001 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 4: Health financing Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Health economic evaluation Language: Chinese Journal: China Pharmacy Year: 2001 Document type: Article
...