Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic disease: a meta analysis / 中华肝胆外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) using meta-analysis.Methods Comprehensive literature search was conducted on articles only in English published from 2006 to 2012 on MEDLINE,EMbase,Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials to compare LDP with ODP for Pancreatic disease.Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently.The quality of the included trials was evaluated.Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.1 software.Results Fourteen controlled clinical trials (n=1417) were included.The LDP group was significantly longer than the ODP group in operation time,and was significantly larger in the number of patients with spleen preservation [(MD-273.10,95％ CI-354.39-191.081,P＜0.01),(OR 2.42,95％ CI 1.78-3.30,P＜0.01) respectively].The LDP group was significantly less than the ODP group in intraoperative blood loss,time to oral intake,and length of hospital stay [(MD-273.10,95％ CI -354.39-191.81,P＜0.01),(MD-1.78,95％ CI-2.36-1.20,P＜0.01),(MD-3.15,95％ CI-3.97-2.33,P＜0.01) respectively].There were no significant differences in blood transfusion,pancreatic fistula rate,and mortality between the two groups.Conclusions LDP is feasible and safe in treating pancreatic disease.When compared with ODP,LDP has the advantages of having less intraoperative blood loss,quicker recovery and more patients with spleen preservation.