A comparison of the dosimetric effects of systematic MLC leaf position errors on flattening filter and flattening filter-free IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the dosimetric effects of systematic MLC leaf position errors on flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods In totaly of ten patients with NPC were enrolled in the current study.FF IMRT and FFF IMRT plans were designed for each patient, and in-house software was developed to modify the corresponding MLC files.Briefly, three kinds of systematic MLC error presented with 0.5 and 1 mm magnitudes error were simulated.The modified MLC files were re-imported into IMRT plans for dose recalculation, and differences in the dosimetry trends between FF-IMRT and FFF-IMRT plans were analyzed using a dosevolume histogram.Results Upon closed MLC, the average changes in D95％ of PTV and D of parotid glands in FFF-IMRT plans were more sensitive than in FF-IMRT plans (t =3.298-4.793, P ＜ 0.05).Otherwise, when MLC are shifted in the same direction, changes in D95％of PTV, D of PGTV, PTV as well as D of left parotid gland in FFF-IMRT plans were also more sensitive (t =2.372-6.844, P ＜ 0.05), whereas average changes in D of right parotid gland presented with less sensitivity (t =-4.049,-3.378, P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions For out-of-field or large organs, FFF-IMRT plans are more sensitive to leaf position error than FF-IMRT plans.